Im a sysadmin by trade and as such i deal with raid enabled servers on a daily basis. We just need to remember that the smallest of the hdds or partitions dictates the arrays capacity. Software vs hardware raid performance and cache usage. A redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. It is a way to virtualize multiple, independent hard disk drives into one or more arrays to improve performance, capacity and reliability. But with budget favoring the software raid, those wanting optimum performance and efficiency of raid will have to go with the hardware raid. Unlike hardware raid, software raid uses the processing power of the operating system in which the raid disks are installed. It sounds like you configured the raid via the bios though so definitely use that. Today we dive into what the differences are and whe we choose them. Just trying to get some feedback from anyone with experience with hardware vs software raid especially on an openvz platform. So if iorom is software, and if i recall correctly linux os raid is hardware raid and therefore if iorom software raid fails you lose all data but with linux os hardware raid if the raid is lost, your data is recoverable. Hardware raid, explains how these different raid implementations work and the benefits of each implementation, and. Apple mac os x, hp hpux, ibm aix, linux, microsoft windows ab windows. Hardware raid vs software raid, is hardware raid portable.
A brief history of raid raid has been around since 1970s 1989 berkeley paper was a taxonomy 1989 witnessed the first raid 5 in software 1990s saw many hardware raid 3, 5s lsi, 3ware, maxstrat, highpoint, intel 1990s also saw the introduction of raidframe mdraid came along in 2001. I have scoured through articles written about tuning software and i have used linux software raid for over 10 years. Yes, hardware raid can be a bit faster but with a sufficiently powerful system, those speed gains become close to imperceptible. Windows software raid has a bad reputation, performance wise, and even storage space seems not too different. Software raid, as you might already know, is usually builtin on your os and unlike a hardware raid, you will need to spend a little extra on a controller card.
Difference between software raid and hardware raid in high level is presented in this video session. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. It is not possible to boot an operating system from a software raid0 or raid5. Im not a big fan of software raid on linux nor cheapie white box hardware. When running basic io tests ddoflagdirect 5k to 100g files, hdparam t, etc. The drives are configured, so that the data is either divided between disks to distribute load, or duplicated to ensure that it can be recovered once a disk fails. Fake raid is raid that is at least partially implemented in software in the driver itself, rather than in hardware. You have to keep in mind that if hardware raid is broken, you need to rebuild the raid with the same hardware vendor. One performance story i can give, is with some hp servers i configured as some fairly kickass splunk servers. A raid can be deployed using both software and hardware. Some of these are supported on linux using the driver.
Software raid can never be faster it is at best as fast for stupid raid types, like striping than hardware raid unless those who implemented the hardware raid were a bunch of rabid chimps on acid. So if i recall correctly, software raid would for an example is to be utilizing a intel option rom raid controller. Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and how much you want to pay. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie.
If you configured the raid via software raid mdadm the use that. The linux kernel contains an md driver that allows the raid solution to be completely hardware independent. With todays faster cpus, software raid outperforms hardware raid. This integration is really what has allowed software raid to dramatically outpace hardware raid. Ive used software raid as well, only in raid0, and it worked flawlessly in suse linux and still use software raid 1 in suse 9. In testing both software and hardware raid performance i employed six 750gb samsung sata drives in three raid. It is generally fine, however, to use windows software raid on simple storage. Given that you can safely move the entire enclosure from one server to another with the raid intact but youd have to make sure your new server knew to use it e. There are no advantages to fake raid or expensive real hardware raid controllers that i know of. Software raid is part of os, so no need to spend extract money. Obviously performance of hardware raid vs software raid relies immensely on the controllers used in either case. Pricing and hardware features are going to be your real delimiters here. For things like simple mirroring raid1 the data just needs to be written twice and the drive controller can do that itself with instructions from the kernel so no need to get cpu involved at all. Windows software raid vs hardware raid ars technica.
Most of these only work in windows since they are driver dependent. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. What is the difference between hardware raid and software. No hotswap is possible with software alone, without a hardware support. With hardware raid, because the processing work is done on a discrete controller card in the server or at the level of the storage subsystem, theres no added load to the server processor and buses. Software vs bios vs hardware raid ars technica openforum. Raid stands for redundant array of inexpensive disks. This is a method of improving the performance and reliability of your storage media by using multiple drives. I have had to recover from failed disks and completely failed arrays with both high end raid cards and linux software raid. For this reason, users regularly create a software raid on linux to satisfy their large data needs. We have explained what raid is and the two types of raid, today we want to discuss the difference between hardware raid and software raid, as many users have been confused by them brief introduction about hardware raid. Ive been hoping other people would post with some experience, because im in the middle of a decision and am leaning toward software but. Ultimately, the difference comes down to where the raid processing is performed.
Difference between hardware raid and software raid. Firstly linux software raid is so well written in the kernel now that very little of the traffic actually hits the cpu. Ive used mdadm and lvm raids in production since about 2004 without data loss and you backup anyway right. So raid is kind of a method for improving the performance and reliability of your storage media by using multiple drives. We list the pros and cons of hardware vs software raid to help you. Linux uses either the md raid or lvm for a software raid. Wayne is right, if youre using linux, kernels soft raid works like charm. Is there a difference between hardware raid and software raid. It is used to improve disk io performance and reliability of your server or workstation. First, there are operating systems where software raid does not function, or does not function as well as linux mdadm. The software raid works on partition level and it can sometime increase complexity if you mix different partitions and hardware raid. Raid 5 vs raid 10 performance and other raid levels. Flexibility is the key advantage of an open source software raid, like linux mdadm, but may require a specialized skillset for proper. However, there are certain limitations of a software raid.
Sorry for my bad english, but its crazy always setup software raid i whanna hardware raid and when i can find solution. How to create a software raid 5 in linux mint ubuntu. Bsd opensolaris and linux raid software drivers are open source. There will likely be more advanced features, such as drives being hotswappable in case of failure. Windows has some form of software raid, but generally it is not recommended and is not easy to boot from. Vmware doesnt support software raid at all to my knowledge, and so its not an option there. This tutorial explains how to view, list, create, add, remove, delete, resize, format, mount and configure raid levels 0, 1 and 5 in linux step by step with practical examples. Hardware raid and software raid are both important storage tools that we use with our systems. Not to mention the performance hit under heavy io not having a dedicated hardware controller handling all the striping and parity operations. The hardware based array manages the raid subsystem independently from the host and presents to the host only a single disk per raid array. Hardware raid has the ability to take a group of drives and make it appear as a single drive. Areca and lsi hardware raid controllers, and with intel, amd and even via hostraid i was pretty surprised when i connected a 250gb hard drive from some old amd desktop box to a hp g1 microserver, and the controller told me that raid is degraded.
It can either be performed in the host servers cpu software raid, or in an external cpu hardware raid. Software vs hardware raid performance and cache usage server. For software raid i used the linux kernel software raid functionality of a system running 64bit fedora 9. With this program, users can create a software raid array in a matter of minutes. Recovery is easier on linux software raid and downtime was less on linux software raid as well. I do agree though, that hardware raid is the best choice. Softwareraid gegen hardwareraid im benchmarkvergleich. But i have problem deciding that should i use hardware raid raid6 or zfs based raidz2. You can benchmark the performance difference between running a raid using the linux kernel software raid and a hardware raid. Setting up a storage pool has gotten easier on linux over the years, thanks to tools like mdadm. Hardware raid if provided by the enclosure as opposed to an adapter in your server can vary by vendor. The performance of a software based array depends on the server cpu performance and load.
Additionally, hardware assisted software raid usually comes with a variety of drivers for the most popular operating systems, and therefore, is more os independent than pure software raid. Linux support of these sorts of devices is usually very good because theyre commonly used in enterprise situations on linux servers. We can use full disks, or we can use same sized partitions on different sized drives. Take a look on this document, i think its what you need. Software vs hardware raid nixcraft linux tips, hacks. There is no real advantage in using these on linux, i suggest to stick with the linux raid. How to set up a software raid on linux addictivetips. The linux software raid stack is just as much of a component as a hardware card, and its failure modes are numerous and amusing except when you get. The hardware based system manages the raid subsystem independently from the host and presents to the host only a single disk per raid array. Linux file systems are generally fragile enough without throwing software raid and questionable hardware into the mix.
828 1104 1396 562 816 125 259 1520 419 1505 896 9 237 23 123 512 1268 470 911 503 116 285 1018 1399 716 614 111 895 788 52 961 107 1194 791 1149 869 1336 1283 973 773 1448 1150 887 699 843 168 896